Yatırımcı.AI

FIF vs VVM Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FIF (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. İstanbul Portföy Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and VVM (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Muhafazakar Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

FIFVVM
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FIF vs VVM Fund Comparison
MetricFIFVVMCategory median
Daily−0.49%−0.30%−1.35%
1 week−2.03%−0.11%−2.09%
1 month−7.62%0.91%−4.70%
3 months−23.16%7.18%−1.44%
6 months−24.71%14.82%2.69%
YTD−1.93%30.98%20.04%
1 year−11.54%41.67%28.83%
3 years114.44%233.76%156.52%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FIF vs VVM Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FIF (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. İstanbul Portföy Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and VVM (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Muhafazakar Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FIF leads in 0 and VVM leads in 11. FIF is a Variable Fund fund managed by HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; VVM is a Variable Fund fund managed by AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: VVM leads (−0.30% vs −0.49%). 1 week: VVM leads (−0.11% vs −2.03%). 1 month: VVM leads (0.91% vs −7.62%). 3 months: VVM leads (7.18% vs −23.16%). 6 months: VVM leads (14.82% vs −24.71%). YTD: VVM leads (30.98% vs −1.93%). 1 year: VVM leads (41.67% vs −11.54%). 3 years: VVM leads (233.76% vs 114.44%). Size (TRY): VVM leads (444.1M vs 386M). Investors: VVM leads (7,067 vs 4,587). Risk: VVM leads (2 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FIF returned −1.93% and VVM returned 30.98%; over the last year FIF returned −11.54% and VVM returned 41.67%. Over the last month FIF returned −7.62% and VVM returned 0.91%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, FIF has a size of TRY 386M with 4,587 investors, while VVM has a size of TRY 444.1M with 7,067 investors. VVM leads in size and VVM leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FIF is 5 out of 7 and that of VVM is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.