Yatırımcı.AI

FDG vs OBP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FDG (Fonmap Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) and OBP (Oyak Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) side by side.

FDGOBP
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FDG vs OBP Fund Comparison
MetricFDGOBPCategory median
Daily−0.07%0.07%−0.41%
1 week−0.07%−0.06%−1.69%
1 month−0.52%−0.10%−3.34%
3 months−1.67%5.34%0.00%
6 months0.49%10.15%4.10%
YTD17.68%22.43%21.58%
1 year25.19%36.54%30.90%
3 years60.69%174.96%160.42%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FDG vs OBP Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FDG (Fonmap Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) and OBP (Oyak Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FDG leads in 0 and OBP leads in 11. FDG is a Variable Fund fund managed by Foneva Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; OBP is a Variable Fund fund managed by Oyak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: OBP leads (0.07% vs −0.07%). 1 week: OBP leads (−0.06% vs −0.07%). 1 month: OBP leads (−0.10% vs −0.52%). 3 months: OBP leads (5.34% vs −1.67%). 6 months: OBP leads (10.15% vs 0.49%). YTD: OBP leads (22.43% vs 17.68%). 1 year: OBP leads (36.54% vs 25.19%). 3 years: OBP leads (174.96% vs 60.69%). Size (TRY): OBP leads (30.8M vs 29.6M). Investors: OBP leads (777 vs 473). Risk: OBP leads (4 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FDG returned 17.68% and OBP returned 22.43%; over the last year FDG returned 25.19% and OBP returned 36.54%. Over the last month FDG returned −0.52% and OBP returned −0.10%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, FDG has a size of TRY 29.6M with 473 investors, while OBP has a size of TRY 30.8M with 777 investors. OBP leads in size and OBP leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FDG is 7 out of 7 and that of OBP is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.