EPP vs ILU Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EPP (Emaa Blue Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) and ILU (İstanbul Portföy Onaltıncı Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | EPP | ILU | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.10% | −1.49% | 0.01% |
| 1 week | 0.69% | −2.45% | 0.30% |
| 1 month | 3.03% | −12.41% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 10.09% | −28.06% | 3.96% |
| 6 months | 21.93% | −7.55% | 8.18% |
| YTD | 36.97% | −19.66% | 15.73% |
| 1 year | 47.47% | 1.07% | 20.69% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the EPP vs ILU Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of EPP (Emaa Blue Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) and ILU (İstanbul Portföy Onaltıncı Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, EPP leads in 9 and ILU leads in 1. EPP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Emaa Blue Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ILU is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: EPP leads (0.10% vs −1.49%). 1 week: EPP leads (0.69% vs −2.45%). 1 month: EPP leads (3.03% vs −12.41%). 3 months: EPP leads (10.09% vs −28.06%). 6 months: EPP leads (21.93% vs −7.55%). YTD: EPP leads (36.97% vs −19.66%). 1 year: EPP leads (47.47% vs 1.07%). Size (TRY): ILU leads (1.8B vs 1.7B). Investors: EPP leads (50 vs 2). Risk: EPP leads (2 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, EPP or ILU?
Year to date EPP returned 36.97% and ILU returned −19.66%; over the last year EPP returned 47.47% and ILU returned 1.07%. Over the last month EPP returned 3.03% and ILU returned −12.41%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, EPP or ILU?
As of October 23, 2026, EPP has a size of TRY 1.7B with 50 investors, while ILU has a size of TRY 1.8B with 2 investors. ILU leads in size and EPP leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of EPP and ILU mean?
The CMB risk score of EPP is 2 out of 7 and that of ILU is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.