Yatırımcı.AI

EID vs GNS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EID (Astra Portföy Hisse Senedi Fonu (Hisse Yoğun Fon)) and GNS (Garanti Portföy Enerji Şirketleri Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.

EIDGNS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

EID vs GNS Fund Comparison
MetricEIDGNSCategory median
Today (est.)—1.89%0.36%
Daily0.53%2.07%1.08%
1 week1.49%1.59%2.86%
1 month−2.39%−5.09%−3.07%
3 months−9.23%−11.88%−8.78%
6 months−9.99%−18.10%−11.88%
YTD8.88%5.84%11.07%
1 year13.95%10.96%18.62%
3 years90.72%—90.23%
Returns are based on prices as of November 13, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Nov 13, 2026, 18:15.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the EID vs GNS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of EID (Astra Portföy Hisse Senedi Fonu (Hisse Yoğun Fon)) and GNS (Garanti Portföy Enerji Şirketleri Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, EID leads in 6 and GNS leads in 3. EID is a Stock Fund fund managed by QInvest Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GNS is a Stock Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GNS leads (2.07% vs 0.53%). 1 week: GNS leads (1.59% vs 1.49%). 1 month: EID leads (−2.39% vs −5.09%). 3 months: EID leads (−9.23% vs −11.88%). 6 months: EID leads (−9.99% vs −18.10%). YTD: EID leads (8.88% vs 5.84%). 1 year: EID leads (13.95% vs 10.96%). Size (TRY): GNS leads (71.7M vs 67.7M). Investors: EID leads (1,477 vs 1,233).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date EID returned 8.88% and GNS returned 5.84%; over the last year EID returned 13.95% and GNS returned 10.96%. Over the last month EID returned −2.39% and GNS returned −5.09%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 13, 2026, EID has a size of TRY 67.7M with 1,477 investors, while GNS has a size of TRY 71.7M with 1,233 investors. GNS leads in size and EID leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of EID is 6 out of 7 and that of GNS is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.