ATJ vs RRA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ATJ (Azimut Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) and RRA (Rota Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | ATJ | RRA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | −2.56% | — | −1.97% |
| Daily | 0.51% | 0.32% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | 0.33% | 0.72% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | −5.45% | 3.10% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | −2.90% | 9.65% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | 6.48% | 21.74% | 12.86% |
| YTD | 17.59% | 33.30% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | 28.78% | 48.13% | 24.44% |
| 3 years | 117.41% | — | 111.64% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the ATJ vs RRA comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of ATJ (Azimut Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) and RRA (Rota Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, ATJ leads in 2 and RRA leads in 8. ATJ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RRA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: ATJ leads (0.51% vs 0.32%). 1 week: RRA leads (0.72% vs 0.33%). 1 month: RRA leads (3.10% vs −5.45%). 3 months: RRA leads (9.65% vs −2.90%). 6 months: RRA leads (21.74% vs 6.48%). YTD: RRA leads (33.30% vs 17.59%). 1 year: RRA leads (48.13% vs 28.78%). Size (TRY): ATJ leads (994.4M vs 952.3M). Investors: RRA leads (129 vs 9). Risk: RRA leads (2 vs 6).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, ATJ or RRA?
Year to date ATJ returned 17.59% and RRA returned 33.30%; over the last year ATJ returned 28.78% and RRA returned 48.13%. Over the last month ATJ returned −5.45% and RRA returned 3.10%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, ATJ or RRA?
As of September 28, 2026, ATJ has a size of TRY 994.4M with 9 investors, while RRA has a size of TRY 952.3M with 129 investors. ATJ leads in size and RRA leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of ATJ and RRA mean?
The CMB risk score of ATJ is 6 out of 7 and that of RRA is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.