Yatırımcı.AI

EDT vs RPT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EDT (Deniz Portföy Ted Eğitime Destek Serbest Fon) and RPT (Rota Portföy İkinci Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

EDTRPT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

EDT vs RPT Fund Comparison
MetricEDTRPTCategory median
Today (est.)—0.57%1.08%
Daily0.09%−2.61%0.06%
1 week0.66%−2.06%0.56%
1 month3.02%0.21%1.84%
3 months9.43%5.96%3.29%
6 months20.70%16.82%7.90%
YTD37.83%33.84%17.53%
1 year44.85%40.82%21.48%
3 years—252.73%105.66%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Nov 12, 2026, 12:24.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the EDT vs RPT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of EDT (Deniz Portföy Ted Eğitime Destek Serbest Fon) and RPT (Rota Portföy İkinci Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, EDT leads in 9 and RPT leads in 1. EDT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RPT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: EDT leads (0.09% vs −2.61%). 1 week: EDT leads (0.66% vs −2.06%). 1 month: EDT leads (3.02% vs 0.21%). 3 months: EDT leads (9.43% vs 5.96%). 6 months: EDT leads (20.70% vs 16.82%). YTD: EDT leads (37.83% vs 33.84%). 1 year: EDT leads (44.85% vs 40.82%). Size (TRY): EDT leads (954M vs 932.1M). Investors: EDT leads (522 vs 120). Risk: RPT leads (1 vs 2).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date EDT returned 37.83% and RPT returned 33.84%; over the last year EDT returned 44.85% and RPT returned 40.82%. Over the last month EDT returned 3.02% and RPT returned 0.21%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, EDT has a size of TRY 954M with 522 investors, while RPT has a size of TRY 932.1M with 120 investors. EDT leads in size and EDT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of EDT is 2 out of 7 and that of RPT is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.