EBS vs KTT Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EBS (Emaa Blue Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz-Abd Doları) Fon) and KTT (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Dördüncü Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | EBS | KTT | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.05% | 0.02% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | 0.21% | 0.06% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | 1.00% | 0.79% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | 5.31% | 5.04% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | 13.02% | 12.19% | 12.86% |
| YTD | 15.87% | 15.25% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | — | 21.77% | 24.44% |
| 3 years | — | 117.95% | 111.64% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the EBS vs KTT Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of EBS (Emaa Blue Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz-Abd Doları) Fon) and KTT (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Dördüncü Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, EBS leads in 6 and KTT leads in 2. EBS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Emaa Blue Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KTT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: EBS leads (0.05% vs 0.02%). 1 week: EBS leads (0.21% vs 0.06%). 1 month: EBS leads (1.00% vs 0.79%). 3 months: EBS leads (5.31% vs 5.04%). 6 months: EBS leads (13.02% vs 12.19%). YTD: EBS leads (15.87% vs 15.25%). Size (TRY): KTT leads (5.1B vs 4.8B). Investors: KTT leads (1,369 vs 24).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, EBS or KTT?
Year to date EBS returned 15.87% and KTT returned 15.25%; over the last year EBS returned — and KTT returned 21.77%. Over the last month EBS returned 1.00% and KTT returned 0.79%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, EBS or KTT?
As of September 28, 2026, EBS has a size of TRY 4.8B with 24 investors, while KTT has a size of TRY 5.1B with 1,369 investors. KTT leads in size and KTT leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of EBS and KTT mean?
The CMB risk score of EBS is 0 out of 7 and that of KTT is 0. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.