Yatırımcı.AI

DRT vs RGD Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DRT (Deniz Portföy Robotik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) and RGD (Re-Pıe Portföy Agresif Değişken Fon) side by side.

DRTRGD
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

DRT vs RGD Fund Comparison
MetricDRTRGDCategory median
Today (est.)—−1.89%−1.89%
Daily1.36%0.27%0.32%
1 week1.58%−0.66%0.42%
1 month−3.49%−5.43%−1.48%
3 months3.37%0.58%4.48%
6 months25.30%14.33%14.82%
YTD20.73%9.54%25.33%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Sep 28, 2026, 11:19.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the DRT vs RGD comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of DRT (Deniz Portföy Robotik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) and RGD (Re-Pıe Portföy Agresif Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, DRT leads in 8 and RGD leads in 0. DRT is a Variable Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.ş; RGD is a Variable Fund fund managed by Re-Pıe Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: DRT leads (1.36% vs 0.27%). 1 week: DRT leads (1.58% vs −0.66%). 1 month: DRT leads (−3.49% vs −5.43%). 3 months: DRT leads (3.37% vs 0.58%). 6 months: DRT leads (25.30% vs 14.33%). YTD: DRT leads (20.73% vs 9.54%). Size (TRY): DRT leads (26.6M vs 23.8M). Investors: DRT leads (466 vs 98).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date DRT returned 20.73% and RGD returned 9.54%; over the last year DRT returned — and RGD returned —. Over the last month DRT returned −3.49% and RGD returned −5.43%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, DRT has a size of TRY 26.6M with 466 investors, while RGD has a size of TRY 23.8M with 98 investors. DRT leads in size and DRT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of DRT is 5 out of 7 and that of RGD is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.