Yatırımcı.AI

DKL vs PJP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DKL (Deniz Portföy Birinci Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and PJP (Perform Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

DKLPJP
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

DKL vs PJP Fund Comparison
MetricDKLPJPCategory median
Daily0.08%0.10%0.05%
1 week0.54%0.59%0.44%
1 month1.88%1.42%0.38%
3 months5.92%5.00%3.95%
6 months11.65%11.18%8.45%
YTD17.90%18.55%16.06%
1 year21.65%−0.16%20.98%
3 years—73.85%107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the DKL vs PJP Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of DKL (Deniz Portföy Birinci Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and PJP (Perform Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, DKL leads in 7 and PJP leads in 3. DKL is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PJP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Perform Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PJP leads (0.10% vs 0.08%). 1 week: PJP leads (0.59% vs 0.54%). 1 month: DKL leads (1.88% vs 1.42%). 3 months: DKL leads (5.92% vs 5.00%). 6 months: DKL leads (11.65% vs 11.18%). YTD: PJP leads (18.55% vs 17.90%). 1 year: DKL leads (21.65% vs −0.16%). Size (TRY): DKL leads (338.5M vs 337.7M). Investors: DKL leads (90 vs 6). Risk: DKL leads (3 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date DKL returned 17.90% and PJP returned 18.55%; over the last year DKL returned 21.65% and PJP returned −0.16%. Over the last month DKL returned 1.88% and PJP returned 1.42%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, DKL has a size of TRY 338.5M with 90 investors, while PJP has a size of TRY 337.7M with 6 investors. DKL leads in size and DKL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of DKL is 3 out of 7 and that of PJP is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.