DHT vs FDG Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DHT (Deniz Portföy Havacılık ve Savunma Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) and FDG (Fonmap Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | DHT | FDG | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.42% | −0.01% | 0.32% |
| 1 week | 1.01% | −0.05% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | −3.74% | −0.01% | −1.48% |
| 3 months | 4.31% | −1.71% | 4.48% |
| 6 months | 10.15% | 5.10% | 14.82% |
| YTD | 13.99% | 14.47% | 25.33% |
| 1 year | — | 32.05% | 35.72% |
| 3 years | — | 60.69% | 161.05% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the DHT vs FDG comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of DHT (Deniz Portföy Havacılık ve Savunma Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) and FDG (Fonmap Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, DHT leads in 5 and FDG leads in 4. DHT is a Variable Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.ş; FDG is a Variable Fund fund managed by Foneva Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: DHT leads (0.42% vs −0.01%). 1 week: DHT leads (1.01% vs −0.05%). 1 month: FDG leads (−0.01% vs −3.74%). 3 months: DHT leads (4.31% vs −1.71%). 6 months: DHT leads (10.15% vs 5.10%). YTD: FDG leads (14.47% vs 13.99%). Size (TRY): FDG leads (47M vs 45.3M). Investors: DHT leads (686 vs 552). Risk: FDG leads (4 vs 6).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, DHT or FDG?
Year to date DHT returned 13.99% and FDG returned 14.47%; over the last year DHT returned — and FDG returned 32.05%. Over the last month DHT returned −3.74% and FDG returned −0.01%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, DHT or FDG?
As of September 28, 2026, DHT has a size of TRY 45.3M with 686 investors, while FDG has a size of TRY 47M with 552 investors. FDG leads in size and DHT leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of DHT and FDG mean?
The CMB risk score of DHT is 6 out of 7 and that of FDG is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.