FDG vs KRF Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FDG (Fonmap Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) and KRF (Kare Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | FDG | KRF | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.01% | −0.24% | 0.32% |
| 1 week | −0.05% | −0.42% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | −0.01% | 0.09% | −1.48% |
| 3 months | −1.71% | 6.92% | 4.48% |
| 6 months | 5.10% | 14.74% | 14.82% |
| YTD | 14.47% | 25.37% | 25.33% |
| 1 year | 32.05% | 38.10% | 35.72% |
| 3 years | 60.69% | 214.61% | 161.05% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the FDG vs KRF comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FDG (Fonmap Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) and KRF (Kare Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FDG leads in 5 and KRF leads in 6. FDG is a Variable Fund fund managed by Foneva Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KRF is a Variable Fund fund managed by Kare Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: FDG leads (−0.01% vs −0.24%). 1 week: FDG leads (−0.05% vs −0.42%). 1 month: KRF leads (0.09% vs −0.01%). 3 months: KRF leads (6.92% vs −1.71%). 6 months: KRF leads (14.74% vs 5.10%). YTD: KRF leads (25.37% vs 14.47%). 1 year: KRF leads (38.10% vs 32.05%). 3 years: KRF leads (214.61% vs 60.69%). Size (TRY): FDG leads (47M vs 45.3M). Investors: FDG leads (552 vs 521). Risk: FDG leads (4 vs 5).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, FDG or KRF?
Year to date FDG returned 14.47% and KRF returned 25.37%; over the last year FDG returned 32.05% and KRF returned 38.10%. Over the last month FDG returned −0.01% and KRF returned 0.09%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FDG or KRF?
As of September 28, 2026, FDG has a size of TRY 47M with 552 investors, while KRF has a size of TRY 45.3M with 521 investors. FDG leads in size and FDG leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FDG and KRF mean?
The CMB risk score of FDG is 4 out of 7 and that of KRF is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.