Yatırımcı.AI

DFD vs ODS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DFD (Deniz Portföy Emtia Serbest Fon) and ODS (Oyak Portföy İkinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

DFDODS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

DFD vs ODS Fund Comparison
MetricDFDODSCategory median
Daily−0.67%−0.11%0.07%
1 week−0.94%0.36%0.51%
1 month−5.08%1.67%1.66%
3 months−3.65%3.63%3.04%
6 months−3.91%8.17%8.17%
YTD16.59%12.84%17.49%
1 year20.92%15.28%21.23%
3 years96.67%99.84%105.57%
Returns are based on prices as of November 13, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the DFD vs ODS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of DFD (Deniz Portföy Emtia Serbest Fon) and ODS (Oyak Portföy İkinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, DFD leads in 3 and ODS leads in 7. DFD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ODS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Oyak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ODS leads (−0.11% vs −0.67%). 1 week: ODS leads (0.36% vs −0.94%). 1 month: ODS leads (1.67% vs −5.08%). 3 months: ODS leads (3.63% vs −3.65%). 6 months: ODS leads (8.17% vs −3.91%). YTD: DFD leads (16.59% vs 12.84%). 1 year: DFD leads (20.92% vs 15.28%). 3 years: ODS leads (99.84% vs 96.67%). Size (TRY): ODS leads (116.4M vs 116.2M). Investors: DFD leads (364 vs 86).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date DFD returned 16.59% and ODS returned 12.84%; over the last year DFD returned 20.92% and ODS returned 15.28%. Over the last month DFD returned −5.08% and ODS returned 1.67%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 13, 2026, DFD has a size of TRY 116.2M with 364 investors, while ODS has a size of TRY 116.4M with 86 investors. ODS leads in size and DFD leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of DFD is 6 out of 7 and that of ODS is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.