Yatırımcı.AI

DEF vs OTK Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DEF (Allbatross Portföy Defne Serbest Fon) and OTK (Oyak Portföy Birinci Katılım Serbest Fon) side by side.

DEFOTK
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

DEF vs OTK Fund Comparison
MetricDEFOTKCategory median
Daily1.64%0.10%−0.07%
1 week1.36%0.66%−0.29%
1 month−1.15%2.99%0.00%
3 months2.46%9.23%4.33%
6 months12.93%19.51%11.90%
YTD21.31%29.84%14.97%
1 year35.13%41.69%21.27%
3 years72.78%155.40%111.30%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the DEF vs OTK Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of DEF (Allbatross Portföy Defne Serbest Fon) and OTK (Oyak Portföy Birinci Katılım Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, DEF leads in 3 and OTK leads in 7. DEF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Allbatross Portföy Yönetimi Anonim Şirketi; OTK is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Oyak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: DEF leads (1.64% vs 0.10%). 1 week: DEF leads (1.36% vs 0.66%). 1 month: OTK leads (2.99% vs −1.15%). 3 months: OTK leads (9.23% vs 2.46%). 6 months: OTK leads (19.51% vs 12.93%). YTD: OTK leads (29.84% vs 21.31%). 1 year: OTK leads (41.69% vs 35.13%). 3 years: OTK leads (155.40% vs 72.78%). Size (TRY): OTK leads (3.5M vs 3.1M). Investors: DEF leads (78 vs 56).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date DEF returned 21.31% and OTK returned 29.84%; over the last year DEF returned 35.13% and OTK returned 41.69%. Over the last month DEF returned −1.15% and OTK returned 2.99%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, DEF has a size of TRY 3.1M with 78 investors, while OTK has a size of TRY 3.5M with 56 investors. OTK leads in size and DEF leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of DEF is 5 out of 7 and that of OTK is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.