Yatırımcı.AI

CKS vs DOL Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CKS (İş Portföy Birinci Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and DOL (Aktif Portföy Üçüncü Aktif Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

CKSDOL
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

CKS vs DOL Fund Comparison
MetricCKSDOLCategory median
Daily−0.02%0.06%0.19%
1 week0.03%0.42%0.42%
1 month0.73%1.78%0.94%
3 months4.99%5.97%5.89%
6 months12.16%12.38%12.86%
YTD15.57%16.90%18.07%
1 year22.42%22.24%24.44%
3 years116.98%23.39%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the CKS vs DOL Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of CKS (İş Portföy Birinci Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and DOL (Aktif Portföy Üçüncü Aktif Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, CKS leads in 4 and DOL leads in 6. CKS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; DOL is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: DOL leads (0.06% vs −0.02%). 1 week: DOL leads (0.42% vs 0.03%). 1 month: DOL leads (1.78% vs 0.73%). 3 months: DOL leads (5.97% vs 4.99%). 6 months: DOL leads (12.38% vs 12.16%). YTD: DOL leads (16.90% vs 15.57%). 1 year: CKS leads (22.42% vs 22.24%). 3 years: CKS leads (116.98% vs 23.39%). Size (TRY): CKS leads (5.7B vs 5.5B). Investors: CKS leads (2,290 vs 329).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date CKS returned 15.57% and DOL returned 16.90%; over the last year CKS returned 22.42% and DOL returned 22.24%. Over the last month CKS returned 0.73% and DOL returned 1.78%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, CKS has a size of TRY 5.7B with 2,290 investors, while DOL has a size of TRY 5.5B with 329 investors. CKS leads in size and CKS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of CKS is 0 out of 7 and that of DOL is 0. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.