Yatırımcı.AI

CHK vs TI6 Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CHK (Qnb Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and TI6 (İş Portföy Borçlanma Araçları (TL) Fonu) side by side.

CHKTI6
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

CHK vs TI6 Fund Comparison
MetricCHKTI6Category median
Daily0.27%0.30%0.24%
1 week0.38%0.59%0.61%
1 month0.83%1.55%1.60%
3 months5.43%5.88%7.35%
6 months15.87%16.68%18.12%
YTD18.31%15.06%20.27%
1 year35.10%30.03%35.25%
3 years165.88%146.47%164.38%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the CHK vs TI6 Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of CHK (Qnb Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and TI6 (İş Portföy Borçlanma Araçları (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, CHK leads in 5 and TI6 leads in 6. CHK is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by Qnb Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; TI6 is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: TI6 leads (0.30% vs 0.27%). 1 week: TI6 leads (0.59% vs 0.38%). 1 month: TI6 leads (1.55% vs 0.83%). 3 months: TI6 leads (5.88% vs 5.43%). 6 months: TI6 leads (16.68% vs 15.87%). YTD: CHK leads (18.31% vs 15.06%). 1 year: CHK leads (35.10% vs 30.03%). 3 years: CHK leads (165.88% vs 146.47%). Size (TRY): TI6 leads (739.7M vs 705.7M). Investors: CHK leads (28,172 vs 4,957). Risk: CHK leads (3 vs 4).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date CHK returned 18.31% and TI6 returned 15.06%; over the last year CHK returned 35.10% and TI6 returned 30.03%. Over the last month CHK returned 0.83% and TI6 returned 1.55%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, CHK has a size of TRY 705.7M with 28,172 investors, while TI6 has a size of TRY 739.7M with 4,957 investors. TI6 leads in size and CHK leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of CHK is 3 out of 7 and that of TI6 is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.