Yatırımcı.AI

CHK vs GUV Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CHK (Qnb Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GUV (Garanti Portföy Uzun Vadeli Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) side by side.

CHKGUV
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

CHK vs GUV Fund Comparison
MetricCHKGUVCategory median
Daily0.27%0.20%0.24%
1 week0.38%0.28%0.61%
1 month0.83%0.67%1.60%
3 months5.43%4.20%7.35%
6 months15.87%15.36%18.12%
YTD18.31%9.71%20.27%
1 year35.10%25.14%35.25%
3 years165.88%15.55%164.38%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the CHK vs GUV comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of CHK (Qnb Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GUV (Garanti Portföy Uzun Vadeli Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, CHK leads in 10 and GUV leads in 1. CHK is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by Qnb Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; GUV is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: CHK leads (0.27% vs 0.20%). 1 week: CHK leads (0.38% vs 0.28%). 1 month: CHK leads (0.83% vs 0.67%). 3 months: CHK leads (5.43% vs 4.20%). 6 months: CHK leads (15.87% vs 15.36%). YTD: CHK leads (18.31% vs 9.71%). 1 year: CHK leads (35.10% vs 25.14%). 3 years: CHK leads (165.88% vs 15.55%). Size (TRY): GUV leads (737.3M vs 705.7M). Investors: CHK leads (28,172 vs 1,741). Risk: CHK leads (3 vs 5).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date CHK returned 18.31% and GUV returned 9.71%; over the last year CHK returned 35.10% and GUV returned 25.14%. Over the last month CHK returned 0.83% and GUV returned 0.67%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, CHK has a size of TRY 705.7M with 28,172 investors, while GUV has a size of TRY 737.3M with 1,741 investors. GUV leads in size and CHK leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of CHK is 3 out of 7 and that of GUV is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.