Yatırımcı.AI

CHG vs HPD Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CHG (Qnb Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Agresif Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and HPD (Hsbc Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) side by side.

CHGHPD
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

CHG vs HPD Fund Comparison
MetricCHGHPDCategory median
Today (est.)—−1.78%−1.84%
Daily0.54%0.29%0.32%
1 week0.37%0.39%0.42%
1 month−2.77%−0.14%−1.48%
3 months4.52%3.79%4.48%
6 months7.79%9.42%14.82%
YTD16.72%15.94%25.33%
1 year24.01%16.09%35.72%
3 years112.42%112.10%161.05%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Sep 28, 2026, 12:05.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the CHG vs HPD comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of CHG (Qnb Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Agresif Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and HPD (Hsbc Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, CHG leads in 5 and HPD leads in 6. CHG is a Variable Fund fund managed by Qnb Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; HPD is a Variable Fund fund managed by Hsbc Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: CHG leads (0.54% vs 0.29%). 1 week: HPD leads (0.39% vs 0.37%). 1 month: HPD leads (−0.14% vs −2.77%). 3 months: CHG leads (4.52% vs 3.79%). 6 months: HPD leads (9.42% vs 7.79%). YTD: CHG leads (16.72% vs 15.94%). 1 year: CHG leads (24.01% vs 16.09%). 3 years: CHG leads (112.42% vs 112.10%). Size (TRY): HPD leads (287.8M vs 279.2M). Investors: HPD leads (1,429 vs 350). Risk: HPD leads (0 vs 6).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date CHG returned 16.72% and HPD returned 15.94%; over the last year CHG returned 24.01% and HPD returned 16.09%. Over the last month CHG returned −2.77% and HPD returned −0.14%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, CHG has a size of TRY 279.2M with 350 investors, while HPD has a size of TRY 287.8M with 1,429 investors. HPD leads in size and HPD leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of CHG is 6 out of 7 and that of HPD is 0. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.