Yatırımcı.AI

CHC vs RPM Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CHC (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Muhafazakar Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and RPM (Rota Portföy İlaç ve Medikal Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) side by side.

CHCRPM
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

CHC vs RPM Fund Comparison
MetricCHCRPMCategory median
Daily−0.11%−1.11%−0.83%
1 week0.20%−0.86%−0.98%
1 month2.43%−7.93%−1.82%
3 months8.87%5.87%3.78%
6 months18.31%18.41%14.04%
YTD29.95%26.78%24.40%
1 year45.23%46.65%34.17%
3 years295.75%132.01%157.59%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the CHC vs RPM Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of CHC (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Muhafazakar Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and RPM (Rota Portföy İlaç ve Medikal Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, CHC leads in 7 and RPM leads in 4. CHC is a Variable Fund fund managed by QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; RPM is a Variable Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: CHC leads (−0.11% vs −1.11%). 1 week: CHC leads (0.20% vs −0.86%). 1 month: CHC leads (2.43% vs −7.93%). 3 months: CHC leads (8.87% vs 5.87%). 6 months: RPM leads (18.41% vs 18.31%). YTD: CHC leads (29.95% vs 26.78%). 1 year: RPM leads (46.65% vs 45.23%). 3 years: CHC leads (295.75% vs 132.01%). Size (TRY): RPM leads (68.3M vs 67.5M). Investors: RPM leads (2,484 vs 89). Risk: CHC leads (3 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date CHC returned 29.95% and RPM returned 26.78%; over the last year CHC returned 45.23% and RPM returned 46.65%. Over the last month CHC returned 2.43% and RPM returned −7.93%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, CHC has a size of TRY 67.5M with 89 investors, while RPM has a size of TRY 68.3M with 2,484 investors. RPM leads in size and RPM leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of CHC is 3 out of 7 and that of RPM is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.