Yatırımcı.AI

BVV vs RPM Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BVV (BV Portföy Teknoloji Değişken Fon) and RPM (Rota Portföy İlaç ve Medikal Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) side by side.

BVVRPM
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BVV vs RPM Fund Comparison
MetricBVVRPMCategory median
Daily−3.70%1.60%−1.41%
1 week−0.98%1.83%−0.69%
1 month−10.58%−0.51%−3.96%
3 months−0.89%0.28%−1.43%
6 months16.41%12.95%1.85%
YTD43.83%24.30%17.97%
1 year44.91%34.12%23.69%
3 years229.94%146.59%149.99%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BVV vs RPM Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BVV (BV Portföy Teknoloji Değişken Fon) and RPM (Rota Portföy İlaç ve Medikal Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BVV leads in 4 and RPM leads in 6. BVV is a Variable Fund fund managed by BV Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RPM is a Variable Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: RPM leads (1.60% vs −3.70%). 1 week: RPM leads (1.83% vs −0.98%). 1 month: RPM leads (−0.51% vs −10.58%). 3 months: RPM leads (0.28% vs −0.89%). 6 months: BVV leads (16.41% vs 12.95%). YTD: BVV leads (43.83% vs 24.30%). 1 year: BVV leads (44.91% vs 34.12%). 3 years: BVV leads (229.94% vs 146.59%). Size (TRY): RPM leads (54.2M vs 53M). Investors: RPM leads (2,184 vs 770).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BVV returned 43.83% and RPM returned 24.30%; over the last year BVV returned 44.91% and RPM returned 34.12%. Over the last month BVV returned −10.58% and RPM returned −0.51%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, BVV has a size of TRY 53M with 770 investors, while RPM has a size of TRY 54.2M with 2,184 investors. RPM leads in size and RPM leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BVV is 6 out of 7 and that of RPM is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.