BVV vs FIV Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BVV (BV Portföy Teknoloji Değişken Fon) and FIV (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Atak Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BVV | FIV | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −1.08% | 0.92% | 0.21% |
| 1 week | −0.15% | 2.30% | 1.17% |
| 1 month | −11.72% | −4.60% | −0.49% |
| 3 months | −10.61% | −4.74% | −0.87% |
| 6 months | −0.97% | −1.10% | 0.68% |
| YTD | 39.15% | 26.12% | 22.53% |
| 1 year | 42.61% | 31.26% | 29.33% |
| 3 years | 216.92% | 125.72% | 156.25% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BVV vs FIV Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BVV (BV Portföy Teknoloji Değişken Fon) and FIV (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Atak Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, BVV leads in 6 and FIV leads in 5. BVV is a Variable Fund fund managed by BV Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; FIV is a Variable Fund fund managed by HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: FIV leads (0.92% vs −1.08%). 1 week: FIV leads (2.30% vs −0.15%). 1 month: FIV leads (−4.60% vs −11.72%). 3 months: FIV leads (−4.74% vs −10.61%). 6 months: BVV leads (−0.97% vs −1.10%). YTD: BVV leads (39.15% vs 26.12%). 1 year: BVV leads (42.61% vs 31.26%). 3 years: BVV leads (216.92% vs 125.72%). Size (TRY): BVV leads (49.6M vs 48.8M). Investors: FIV leads (803 vs 740). Risk: BVV leads (6 vs 7).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BVV or FIV?
Year to date BVV returned 39.15% and FIV returned 26.12%; over the last year BVV returned 42.61% and FIV returned 31.26%. Over the last month BVV returned −11.72% and FIV returned −4.60%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BVV or FIV?
As of November 13, 2026, BVV has a size of TRY 49.6M with 740 investors, while FIV has a size of TRY 48.8M with 803 investors. BVV leads in size and FIV leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BVV and FIV mean?
The CMB risk score of BVV is 6 out of 7 and that of FIV is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.