BS1 vs MDF Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BS1 (Ahlatcı Portföy Birinci Serbest (TL) Fon) and MDF (Fiba Portföy Model Emtia Fon Sepeti Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BS1 | MDF | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | 1.36% | — | −1.16% |
| Daily | −2.28% | −0.47% | 0.01% |
| 1 week | −7.08% | −0.51% | 0.30% |
| 1 month | −0.69% | −0.55% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 27.37% | 10.14% | 3.96% |
| 6 months | 37.64% | 6.20% | 8.18% |
| YTD | 58.45% | 19.97% | 15.73% |
| 1 year | — | 29.90% | 20.69% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BS1 vs MDF Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BS1 (Ahlatcı Portföy Birinci Serbest (TL) Fon) and MDF (Fiba Portföy Model Emtia Fon Sepeti Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, BS1 leads in 4 and MDF leads in 4. BS1 is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ahlatcı Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MDF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: MDF leads (−0.47% vs −2.28%). 1 week: MDF leads (−0.51% vs −7.08%). 1 month: MDF leads (−0.55% vs −0.69%). 3 months: BS1 leads (27.37% vs 10.14%). 6 months: BS1 leads (37.64% vs 6.20%). YTD: BS1 leads (58.45% vs 19.97%). Size (TRY): MDF leads (445.2M vs 433.2M). Investors: BS1 leads (1,019 vs 787).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BS1 or MDF?
Year to date BS1 returned 58.45% and MDF returned 19.97%; over the last year BS1 returned — and MDF returned 29.90%. Over the last month BS1 returned −0.69% and MDF returned −0.55%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BS1 or MDF?
As of October 23, 2026, BS1 has a size of TRY 433.2M with 1,019 investors, while MDF has a size of TRY 445.2M with 787 investors. MDF leads in size and BS1 leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BS1 and MDF mean?
The CMB risk score of BS1 is 6 out of 7 and that of MDF is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.