Yatırımcı.AI

BPS vs RTG Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BPS (Bnp Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Agresif Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and RTG (Ata Portföy Robotik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) side by side.

BPSRTG
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

BPS vs RTG Fund Comparison
MetricBPSRTGCategory median
Daily0.97%1.52%0.32%
1 week0.68%4.49%0.42%
1 month−6.05%1.51%−1.48%
3 months−5.41%1.81%4.48%
6 months4.84%44.63%14.82%
YTD26.50%45.15%25.33%
1 year31.32%55.34%35.72%
3 years135.30%233.62%161.05%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the BPS vs RTG comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BPS (Bnp Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Agresif Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and RTG (Ata Portföy Robotik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BPS leads in 0 and RTG leads in 10. BPS is a Variable Fund fund managed by Bnp Parıbas Cardıf Emeklilik A.Ş.; RTG is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ata Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: RTG leads (1.52% vs 0.97%). 1 week: RTG leads (4.49% vs 0.68%). 1 month: RTG leads (1.51% vs −6.05%). 3 months: RTG leads (1.81% vs −5.41%). 6 months: RTG leads (44.63% vs 4.84%). YTD: RTG leads (45.15% vs 26.50%). 1 year: RTG leads (55.34% vs 31.32%). 3 years: RTG leads (233.62% vs 135.30%). Size (TRY): RTG leads (224M vs 217.4M). Investors: RTG leads (4,217 vs 1,302).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date BPS returned 26.50% and RTG returned 45.15%; over the last year BPS returned 31.32% and RTG returned 55.34%. Over the last month BPS returned −6.05% and RTG returned 1.51%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, BPS has a size of TRY 217.4M with 1,302 investors, while RTG has a size of TRY 224M with 4,217 investors. RTG leads in size and RTG leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BPS is 6 out of 7 and that of RTG is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.