BPN vs MHV Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BPN (BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Dinamik Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHV (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Agresif Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BPN | MHV | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −1.78% | −2.66% | −1.41% |
| 1 week | −1.77% | −2.40% | −0.69% |
| 1 month | −6.13% | −9.79% | −3.96% |
| 3 months | −3.24% | −8.35% | −1.43% |
| 6 months | −3.14% | −6.94% | 1.85% |
| YTD | 17.45% | 14.84% | 17.97% |
| 1 year | 29.33% | 16.10% | 23.69% |
| 3 years | 151.48% | 135.66% | 149.99% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BPN vs MHV Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BPN (BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Dinamik Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHV (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Agresif Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, BPN leads in 10 and MHV leads in 1. BPN is a Variable Fund fund managed by BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş.; MHV is a Variable Fund fund managed by MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: BPN leads (−1.78% vs −2.66%). 1 week: BPN leads (−1.77% vs −2.40%). 1 month: BPN leads (−6.13% vs −9.79%). 3 months: BPN leads (−3.24% vs −8.35%). 6 months: BPN leads (−3.14% vs −6.94%). YTD: BPN leads (17.45% vs 14.84%). 1 year: BPN leads (29.33% vs 16.10%). 3 years: BPN leads (151.48% vs 135.66%). Size (TRY): MHV leads (43.3M vs 37.3M). Investors: BPN leads (612 vs 544). Risk: BPN leads (5 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BPN or MHV?
Year to date BPN returned 17.45% and MHV returned 14.84%; over the last year BPN returned 29.33% and MHV returned 16.10%. Over the last month BPN returned −6.13% and MHV returned −9.79%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BPN or MHV?
As of November 2, 2026, BPN has a size of TRY 37.3M with 612 investors, while MHV has a size of TRY 43.3M with 544 investors. MHV leads in size and BPN leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BPN and MHV mean?
The CMB risk score of BPN is 5 out of 7 and that of MHV is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.