BPN vs MHN Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BPN (BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Dinamik Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHN (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Dengeli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BPN | MHN | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −1.10% | −0.82% | −0.41% |
| 1 week | −2.24% | −1.36% | −1.69% |
| 1 month | −4.98% | −2.72% | −3.34% |
| 3 months | −0.90% | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| 6 months | −1.06% | 5.19% | 4.10% |
| YTD | 22.25% | 25.49% | 21.58% |
| 1 year | 39.70% | 36.93% | 30.90% |
| 3 years | 164.79% | 172.76% | 160.42% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BPN vs MHN Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BPN (BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Dinamik Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHN (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Dengeli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, BPN leads in 3 and MHN leads in 8. BPN is a Variable Fund fund managed by BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş.; MHN is a Variable Fund fund managed by MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: MHN leads (−0.82% vs −1.10%). 1 week: MHN leads (−1.36% vs −2.24%). 1 month: MHN leads (−2.72% vs −4.98%). 3 months: MHN leads (1.06% vs −0.90%). 6 months: MHN leads (5.19% vs −1.06%). YTD: MHN leads (25.49% vs 22.25%). 1 year: BPN leads (39.70% vs 36.93%). 3 years: MHN leads (172.76% vs 164.79%). Size (TRY): BPN leads (39.3M vs 33.9M). Investors: BPN leads (612 vs 411). Risk: MHN leads (4 vs 5).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BPN or MHN?
Year to date BPN returned 22.25% and MHN returned 25.49%; over the last year BPN returned 39.70% and MHN returned 36.93%. Over the last month BPN returned −4.98% and MHN returned −2.72%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BPN or MHN?
As of October 22, 2026, BPN has a size of TRY 39.3M with 612 investors, while MHN has a size of TRY 33.9M with 411 investors. BPN leads in size and BPN leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BPN and MHN mean?
The CMB risk score of BPN is 5 out of 7 and that of MHN is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.