Yatırımcı.AI

BNZ vs MHI Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BNZ (BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Katılım Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHI (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Katılım Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

BNZMHI
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BNZ vs MHI Fund Comparison
MetricBNZMHICategory median
Daily−0.02%−0.26%0.08%
1 week0.59%0.20%0.48%
1 month0.59%−0.36%−0.12%
3 months5.44%2.42%3.39%
6 months9.44%4.82%6.24%
YTD28.24%23.48%24.05%
1 year34.62%30.72%32.51%
3 years123.70%128.65%129.90%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BNZ vs MHI Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BNZ (BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Katılım Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHI (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Katılım Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, BNZ leads in 7 and MHI leads in 4. BNZ is a Shariah-compliant Auto-Enrolment (OKS) Standard Fund fund managed by BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş.; MHI is a Shariah-compliant Auto-Enrolment (OKS) Standard Fund fund managed by MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: BNZ leads (−0.02% vs −0.26%). 1 week: BNZ leads (0.59% vs 0.20%). 1 month: BNZ leads (0.59% vs −0.36%). 3 months: BNZ leads (5.44% vs 2.42%). 6 months: BNZ leads (9.44% vs 4.82%). YTD: BNZ leads (28.24% vs 23.48%). 1 year: BNZ leads (34.62% vs 30.72%). 3 years: MHI leads (128.65% vs 123.70%). Size (TRY): MHI leads (862.8M vs 584.2M). Investors: MHI leads (205,606 vs 152,752). Risk: MHI leads (3 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BNZ returned 28.24% and MHI returned 23.48%; over the last year BNZ returned 34.62% and MHI returned 30.72%. Over the last month BNZ returned 0.59% and MHI returned −0.36%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, BNZ has a size of TRY 584.2M with 152,752 investors, while MHI has a size of TRY 862.8M with 205,606 investors. MHI leads in size and MHI leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BNZ is 5 out of 7 and that of MHI is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.