BNZ vs FGH Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BNZ (BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Katılım Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and FGH (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Katılım Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BNZ | FGH | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.02% | 0.05% | 0.08% |
| 1 week | 0.59% | 0.85% | 0.48% |
| 1 month | 0.59% | −0.03% | −0.12% |
| 3 months | 5.44% | 0.70% | 3.39% |
| 6 months | 9.44% | 5.55% | 6.24% |
| YTD | 28.24% | 20.48% | 24.05% |
| 1 year | 34.62% | 27.01% | 32.51% |
| 3 years | 123.70% | 103.32% | 129.90% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BNZ vs FGH Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BNZ (BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Katılım Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and FGH (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Katılım Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, BNZ leads in 8 and FGH leads in 3. BNZ is a Shariah-compliant Auto-Enrolment (OKS) Standard Fund fund managed by BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş.; FGH is a Shariah-compliant Auto-Enrolment (OKS) Standard Fund fund managed by HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: FGH leads (0.05% vs −0.02%). 1 week: FGH leads (0.85% vs 0.59%). 1 month: BNZ leads (0.59% vs −0.03%). 3 months: BNZ leads (5.44% vs 0.70%). 6 months: BNZ leads (9.44% vs 5.55%). YTD: BNZ leads (28.24% vs 20.48%). 1 year: BNZ leads (34.62% vs 27.01%). 3 years: BNZ leads (123.70% vs 103.32%). Size (TRY): BNZ leads (584.2M vs 484.3M). Investors: BNZ leads (152,752 vs 119,588). Risk: FGH leads (3 vs 5).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BNZ or FGH?
Year to date BNZ returned 28.24% and FGH returned 20.48%; over the last year BNZ returned 34.62% and FGH returned 27.01%. Over the last month BNZ returned 0.59% and FGH returned −0.03%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BNZ or FGH?
As of November 12, 2026, BNZ has a size of TRY 584.2M with 152,752 investors, while FGH has a size of TRY 484.3M with 119,588 investors. BNZ leads in size and BNZ leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BNZ and FGH mean?
The CMB risk score of BNZ is 5 out of 7 and that of FGH is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.