Yatırımcı.AI

BJD vs NZT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BJD (Azimut Portföy 13.0 Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and NZT (Neo Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) side by side.

BJDNZT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BJD vs NZT Fund Comparison
MetricBJDNZTCategory median
Daily0.07%0.09%0.06%
1 week0.48%0.64%0.56%
1 month2.36%2.92%1.84%
3 months5.99%9.52%3.29%
6 months12.27%20.68%7.90%
YTD19.72%38.03%17.53%
1 year22.22%45.23%21.48%
3 years89.85%258.47%105.66%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BJD vs NZT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BJD (Azimut Portföy 13.0 Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and NZT (Neo Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BJD leads in 1 and NZT leads in 9. BJD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NZT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: NZT leads (0.09% vs 0.07%). 1 week: NZT leads (0.64% vs 0.48%). 1 month: NZT leads (2.92% vs 2.36%). 3 months: NZT leads (9.52% vs 5.99%). 6 months: NZT leads (20.68% vs 12.27%). YTD: NZT leads (38.03% vs 19.72%). 1 year: NZT leads (45.23% vs 22.22%). 3 years: NZT leads (258.47% vs 89.85%). Size (TRY): BJD leads (880.5M vs 876M). Investors: NZT leads (273 vs 94).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BJD returned 19.72% and NZT returned 38.03%; over the last year BJD returned 22.22% and NZT returned 45.23%. Over the last month BJD returned 2.36% and NZT returned 2.92%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, BJD has a size of TRY 880.5M with 94 investors, while NZT has a size of TRY 876M with 273 investors. BJD leads in size and NZT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BJD is — out of 7 and that of NZT is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.