Yatırımcı.AI

BIP vs RPN Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BIP (İstanbul Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and RPN (Rota Portföy Nev Serbest Fon) side by side.

BIPRPN
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BIP vs RPN Fund Comparison
MetricBIPRPNCategory median
Daily0.10%1.19%0.07%
1 week−0.67%1.49%0.51%
1 month1.15%−5.49%1.66%
3 months7.26%−10.99%3.04%
6 months18.62%−14.23%8.17%
YTD36.51%3.42%17.49%
1 year43.58%7.57%21.23%
3 years—29.85%105.57%
Returns are based on prices as of November 13, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BIP vs RPN Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BIP (İstanbul Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and RPN (Rota Portföy Nev Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BIP leads in 7 and RPN leads in 3. BIP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RPN is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: RPN leads (1.19% vs 0.10%). 1 week: RPN leads (1.49% vs −0.67%). 1 month: BIP leads (1.15% vs −5.49%). 3 months: BIP leads (7.26% vs −10.99%). 6 months: BIP leads (18.62% vs −14.23%). YTD: BIP leads (36.51% vs 3.42%). 1 year: BIP leads (43.58% vs 7.57%). Size (TRY): RPN leads (713.2M vs 712.1M). Investors: BIP leads (136 vs 21). Risk: BIP leads (2 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BIP returned 36.51% and RPN returned 3.42%; over the last year BIP returned 43.58% and RPN returned 7.57%. Over the last month BIP returned 1.15% and RPN returned −5.49%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 13, 2026, BIP has a size of TRY 712.1M with 136 investors, while RPN has a size of TRY 713.2M with 21 investors. RPN leads in size and BIP leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BIP is 2 out of 7 and that of RPN is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.