Yatırımcı.AI

BCK vs DFC Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BCK (Deniz Portföy Blockchain ve Fıntech Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) and DFC (Deniz Portföy Tarım ve Gıda Değişken Fon) side by side.

BCKDFC
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

BCK vs DFC Fund Comparison
MetricBCKDFCCategory median
Daily0.64%−0.43%0.32%
1 week2.40%−1.52%0.42%
1 month0.44%−1.78%−1.48%
3 months5.48%0.72%4.48%
6 months34.33%5.01%14.82%
YTD37.71%25.53%25.33%
1 year42.20%28.57%35.72%
3 years—71.18%161.05%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the BCK vs DFC comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BCK (Deniz Portföy Blockchain ve Fıntech Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) and DFC (Deniz Portföy Tarım ve Gıda Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, BCK leads in 9 and DFC leads in 0. BCK is a Variable Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; DFC is a Variable Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.ş.

Highlights: Daily: BCK leads (0.64% vs −0.43%). 1 week: BCK leads (2.40% vs −1.52%). 1 month: BCK leads (0.44% vs −1.78%). 3 months: BCK leads (5.48% vs 0.72%). 6 months: BCK leads (34.33% vs 5.01%). YTD: BCK leads (37.71% vs 25.53%). 1 year: BCK leads (42.20% vs 28.57%). Size (TRY): BCK leads (107.4M vs 106.5M). Investors: BCK leads (2,321 vs 1,458).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date BCK returned 37.71% and DFC returned 25.53%; over the last year BCK returned 42.20% and DFC returned 28.57%. Over the last month BCK returned 0.44% and DFC returned −1.78%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, BCK has a size of TRY 107.4M with 2,321 investors, while DFC has a size of TRY 106.5M with 1,458 investors. BCK leads in size and BCK leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BCK is 6 out of 7 and that of DFC is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.