Yatırımcı.AI

AZK vs GUB Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AZK (Allıanz Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GUB (Garanti Portföy Özel Sektör Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) side by side.

AZKGUB
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

AZK vs GUB Fund Comparison
MetricAZKGUBCategory median
Daily0.22%0.29%0.24%
1 week0.63%0.68%0.61%
1 month1.51%3.08%1.60%
3 months7.41%9.80%7.35%
6 months20.05%21.16%18.12%
YTD20.82%32.00%20.27%
1 year37.17%45.77%35.25%
3 years175.16%50.79%164.38%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the AZK vs GUB comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AZK (Allıanz Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GUB (Garanti Portföy Özel Sektör Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, AZK leads in 3 and GUB leads in 8. AZK is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by Allıanz Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; GUB is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GUB leads (0.29% vs 0.22%). 1 week: GUB leads (0.68% vs 0.63%). 1 month: GUB leads (3.08% vs 1.51%). 3 months: GUB leads (9.80% vs 7.41%). 6 months: GUB leads (21.16% vs 20.05%). YTD: GUB leads (32.00% vs 20.82%). 1 year: GUB leads (45.77% vs 37.17%). 3 years: AZK leads (175.16% vs 50.79%). Size (TRY): AZK leads (7.6B vs 4.6B). Investors: AZK leads (271,130 vs 10,364). Risk: GUB leads (1 vs 3).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date AZK returned 20.82% and GUB returned 32.00%; over the last year AZK returned 37.17% and GUB returned 45.77%. Over the last month AZK returned 1.51% and GUB returned 3.08%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, AZK has a size of TRY 7.6B with 271,130 investors, while GUB has a size of TRY 4.6B with 10,364 investors. AZK leads in size and AZK leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AZK is 3 out of 7 and that of GUB is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.