Yatırımcı.AI

AVR vs FNO Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AVR (Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Teknoloji Sektörü Yabancı Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and FNO (Qnb Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) side by side.

AVRFNO
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

AVR vs FNO Fund Comparison
MetricAVRFNOCategory median
Daily1.13%0.23%0.30%
1 week6.04%0.06%0.40%
1 month4.91%−0.66%−1.48%
3 months8.59%6.17%4.45%
6 months57.23%11.57%14.82%
YTD53.83%18.17%25.25%
1 year63.66%34.06%35.40%
3 years292.00%186.73%161.05%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the AVR vs FNO comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AVR (Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Teknoloji Sektörü Yabancı Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and FNO (Qnb Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, AVR leads in 10 and FNO leads in 1. AVR is a Variable Fund fund managed by Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; FNO is a Variable Fund fund managed by Qnb Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: AVR leads (1.13% vs 0.23%). 1 week: AVR leads (6.04% vs 0.06%). 1 month: AVR leads (4.91% vs −0.66%). 3 months: AVR leads (8.59% vs 6.17%). 6 months: AVR leads (57.23% vs 11.57%). YTD: AVR leads (53.83% vs 18.17%). 1 year: AVR leads (63.66% vs 34.06%). 3 years: AVR leads (292.00% vs 186.73%). Size (TRY): AVR leads (22.1B vs 10.5B). Investors: AVR leads (332,616 vs 6,308). Risk: FNO leads (4 vs 6).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date AVR returned 53.83% and FNO returned 18.17%; over the last year AVR returned 63.66% and FNO returned 34.06%. Over the last month AVR returned 4.91% and FNO returned −0.66%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, AVR has a size of TRY 22.1B with 332,616 investors, while FNO has a size of TRY 10.5B with 6,308 investors. AVR leads in size and AVR leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AVR is 6 out of 7 and that of FNO is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.