AHL vs FNO Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AHL (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş. Agresif Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and FNO (QNB Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | AHL | FNO | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.76% | 0.06% | 0.21% |
| 1 week | 1.55% | −0.69% | 1.17% |
| 1 month | −2.66% | 0.72% | −0.49% |
| 3 months | −8.54% | 2.68% | −0.87% |
| 6 months | −11.64% | 8.97% | 0.68% |
| YTD | 6.90% | 19.02% | 22.53% |
| 1 year | 13.28% | 26.19% | 29.33% |
| 3 years | 114.04% | 182.73% | 156.25% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the AHL vs FNO Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of AHL (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş. Agresif Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and FNO (QNB Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, AHL leads in 3 and FNO leads in 8. AHL is a Variable Fund fund managed by Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş.; FNO is a Variable Fund fund managed by QNB Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: AHL leads (0.76% vs 0.06%). 1 week: AHL leads (1.55% vs −0.69%). 1 month: FNO leads (0.72% vs −2.66%). 3 months: FNO leads (2.68% vs −8.54%). 6 months: FNO leads (8.97% vs −11.64%). YTD: FNO leads (19.02% vs 6.90%). 1 year: FNO leads (26.19% vs 13.28%). 3 years: FNO leads (182.73% vs 114.04%). Size (TRY): FNO leads (9B vs 8.1B). Investors: AHL leads (122,907 vs 5,736). Risk: FNO leads (4 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, AHL or FNO?
Year to date AHL returned 6.90% and FNO returned 19.02%; over the last year AHL returned 13.28% and FNO returned 26.19%. Over the last month AHL returned −2.66% and FNO returned 0.72%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, AHL or FNO?
As of November 13, 2026, AHL has a size of TRY 8.1B with 122,907 investors, while FNO has a size of TRY 9B with 5,736 investors. FNO leads in size and AHL leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of AHL and FNO mean?
The CMB risk score of AHL is 6 out of 7 and that of FNO is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.