Yatırımcı.AI

AVP vs BPI Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AVP (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Dengeli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and BPI (BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Agresif Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

AVP cannot currently be bought or sold on BEFAS. Its returns in this comparison are based on the last price published on BEFAS (November 21, 2025). AVP fund page

AVPBPI
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

AVP vs BPI Fund Comparison
MetricAVPBPICategory median
Daily0.36%−3.20%−1.35%
1 week2.07%−8.01%−2.09%
1 month3.50%−10.33%−4.70%
3 months4.85%−15.27%−1.44%
6 months18.82%−18.94%2.69%
YTD28.56%1.33%20.04%
1 year38.06%18.75%28.83%
3 years268.23%139.08%156.52%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the AVP vs BPI Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AVP (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Dengeli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and BPI (BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Agresif Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, AVP leads in 10 and BPI leads in 1. AVP is a Variable Fund fund managed by AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; BPI is a Variable Fund fund managed by BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: AVP leads (0.36% vs −3.20%). 1 week: AVP leads (2.07% vs −8.01%). 1 month: AVP leads (3.50% vs −10.33%). 3 months: AVP leads (4.85% vs −15.27%). 6 months: AVP leads (18.82% vs −18.94%). YTD: AVP leads (28.56% vs 1.33%). 1 year: AVP leads (38.06% vs 18.75%). 3 years: AVP leads (268.23% vs 139.08%). Size (TRY): BPI leads (135M vs 133.6M). Investors: AVP leads (5,204 vs 918). Risk: AVP leads (4 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date AVP returned 28.56% and BPI returned 1.33%; over the last year AVP returned 38.06% and BPI returned 18.75%. Over the last month AVP returned 3.50% and BPI returned −10.33%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, AVP has a size of TRY 133.6M with 5,204 investors, while BPI has a size of TRY 135M with 918 investors. BPI leads in size and AVP leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AVP is 4 out of 7 and that of BPI is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.