Yatırımcı.AI

AUV vs NSA Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AUV (Ak Portföy Uzun Vadeli Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and NSA (Neo Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest Fon) side by side.

AUVNSA
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

AUV vs NSA Fund Comparison
MetricAUVNSACategory median
Daily−0.04%0.10%0.01%
1 week−0.04%0.68%0.30%
1 month−0.13%2.98%0.00%
3 months2.94%9.87%3.96%
6 months7.50%21.43%8.18%
YTD12.07%36.18%15.73%
1 year17.54%46.33%20.69%
3 years12.92%48.61%105.65%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the AUV vs NSA Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AUV (Ak Portföy Uzun Vadeli Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and NSA (Neo Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, AUV leads in 1 and NSA leads in 9. AUV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NSA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: NSA leads (0.10% vs −0.04%). 1 week: NSA leads (0.68% vs −0.04%). 1 month: NSA leads (2.98% vs −0.13%). 3 months: NSA leads (9.87% vs 2.94%). 6 months: NSA leads (21.43% vs 7.50%). YTD: NSA leads (36.18% vs 12.07%). 1 year: NSA leads (46.33% vs 17.54%). 3 years: NSA leads (48.61% vs 12.92%). Size (TRY): NSA leads (365.9M vs 356.8M). Investors: AUV leads (454 vs 241).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date AUV returned 12.07% and NSA returned 36.18%; over the last year AUV returned 17.54% and NSA returned 46.33%. Over the last month AUV returned −0.13% and NSA returned 2.98%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, AUV has a size of TRY 356.8M with 454 investors, while NSA has a size of TRY 365.9M with 241 investors. NSA leads in size and AUV leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AUV is — out of 7 and that of NSA is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.