Yatırımcı.AI

ANS vs EHK Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ANS (Viennalife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and EHK (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Katılım Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

ANSEHK
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ANS vs EHK Fund Comparison
MetricANSEHKCategory median
Daily−2.39%−2.56%−2.69%
1 week−5.66%−6.50%−6.58%
1 month−11.97%−9.48%−11.73%
3 months−13.18%−9.92%−13.65%
6 months−13.27%−3.91%−12.24%
YTD5.02%26.24%6.83%
1 year11.15%30.64%14.14%
3 years73.02%—87.81%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ANS vs EHK Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ANS (Viennalife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and EHK (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Katılım Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, ANS leads in 2 and EHK leads in 7. ANS is a Stock Fund fund managed by Viennalife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; EHK is a Stock Fund fund managed by —.

Highlights: Daily: ANS leads (−2.39% vs −2.56%). 1 week: ANS leads (−5.66% vs −6.50%). 1 month: EHK leads (−9.48% vs −11.97%). 3 months: EHK leads (−9.92% vs −13.18%). 6 months: EHK leads (−3.91% vs −13.27%). YTD: EHK leads (26.24% vs 5.02%). 1 year: EHK leads (30.64% vs 11.15%). Size (TRY): EHK leads (894.8M vs 129.3M). Investors: EHK leads (14,314 vs 13,605).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ANS returned 5.02% and EHK returned 26.24%; over the last year ANS returned 11.15% and EHK returned 30.64%. Over the last month ANS returned −11.97% and EHK returned −9.48%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, ANS has a size of TRY 129.3M with 13,605 investors, while EHK has a size of TRY 894.8M with 14,314 investors. EHK leads in size and EHK leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ANS is 6 out of 7 and that of EHK is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.