ANS vs BHS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ANS (Viennalife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and BHS (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş. Sürdürülebilirlik Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | ANS | BHS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −2.39% | −2.02% | −2.69% |
| 1 week | −5.66% | −3.56% | −6.58% |
| 1 month | −11.97% | −7.09% | −11.73% |
| 3 months | −13.18% | −2.97% | −13.65% |
| 6 months | −13.27% | −2.18% | −12.24% |
| YTD | 5.02% | 19.65% | 6.83% |
| 1 year | 11.15% | 26.90% | 14.14% |
| 3 years | 73.02% | 131.58% | 87.81% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the ANS vs BHS Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of ANS (Viennalife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and BHS (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş. Sürdürülebilirlik Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, ANS leads in 0 and BHS leads in 10. ANS is a Stock Fund fund managed by Viennalife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; BHS is a Stock Fund fund managed by Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: BHS leads (−2.02% vs −2.39%). 1 week: BHS leads (−3.56% vs −5.66%). 1 month: BHS leads (−7.09% vs −11.97%). 3 months: BHS leads (−2.97% vs −13.18%). 6 months: BHS leads (−2.18% vs −13.27%). YTD: BHS leads (19.65% vs 5.02%). 1 year: BHS leads (26.90% vs 11.15%). 3 years: BHS leads (131.58% vs 73.02%). Size (TRY): BHS leads (911.5M vs 129.3M). Investors: BHS leads (24,133 vs 13,605).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, ANS or BHS?
Year to date ANS returned 5.02% and BHS returned 19.65%; over the last year ANS returned 11.15% and BHS returned 26.90%. Over the last month ANS returned −11.97% and BHS returned −7.09%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, ANS or BHS?
As of October 23, 2026, ANS has a size of TRY 129.3M with 13,605 investors, while BHS has a size of TRY 911.5M with 24,133 investors. BHS leads in size and BHS leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of ANS and BHS mean?
The CMB risk score of ANS is 6 out of 7 and that of BHS is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.