Yatırımcı.AI

ALJ vs CHM Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ALJ (Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Agresif Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and CHM (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Dinamik Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

ALJCHM
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ALJ vs CHM Fund Comparison
MetricALJCHMCategory median
Daily−1.55%−1.12%−0.41%
1 week−3.22%−2.53%−1.69%
1 month−8.70%−6.47%−3.34%
3 months−4.82%−4.85%0.00%
6 months−7.00%−3.17%4.10%
YTD16.97%15.74%21.58%
1 year27.15%26.26%30.90%
3 years150.70%169.17%160.42%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ALJ vs CHM Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ALJ (Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Agresif Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and CHM (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Dinamik Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, ALJ leads in 5 and CHM leads in 5. ALJ is a Variable Fund fund managed by Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; CHM is a Variable Fund fund managed by QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: CHM leads (−1.12% vs −1.55%). 1 week: CHM leads (−2.53% vs −3.22%). 1 month: CHM leads (−6.47% vs −8.70%). 3 months: ALJ leads (−4.82% vs −4.85%). 6 months: CHM leads (−3.17% vs −7.00%). YTD: ALJ leads (16.97% vs 15.74%). 1 year: ALJ leads (27.15% vs 26.26%). 3 years: CHM leads (169.17% vs 150.70%). Size (TRY): ALJ leads (464.3M vs 458.4M). Investors: ALJ leads (5,589 vs 5,028).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ALJ returned 16.97% and CHM returned 15.74%; over the last year ALJ returned 27.15% and CHM returned 26.26%. Over the last month ALJ returned −8.70% and CHM returned −6.47%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, ALJ has a size of TRY 464.3M with 5,589 investors, while CHM has a size of TRY 458.4M with 5,028 investors. ALJ leads in size and ALJ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ALJ is 6 out of 7 and that of CHM is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.