Yatırımcı.AI

AGC vs DFC Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AGC (Ak Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) and DFC (Deniz Portföy Tarım ve Gıda Değişken Fon) side by side.

AGCDFC
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

AGC vs DFC Fund Comparison
MetricAGCDFCCategory median
Daily0.10%−0.43%0.32%
1 week0.44%−1.52%0.42%
1 month1.71%−1.78%−1.48%
3 months6.27%0.72%4.48%
6 months13.30%5.01%14.82%
YTD19.16%25.53%25.33%
1 year27.22%28.57%35.72%
3 years126.60%71.18%161.05%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the AGC vs DFC comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AGC (Ak Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) and DFC (Deniz Portföy Tarım ve Gıda Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, AGC leads in 9 and DFC leads in 2. AGC is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; DFC is a Variable Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.ş.

Highlights: Daily: AGC leads (0.10% vs −0.43%). 1 week: AGC leads (0.44% vs −1.52%). 1 month: AGC leads (1.71% vs −1.78%). 3 months: AGC leads (6.27% vs 0.72%). 6 months: AGC leads (13.30% vs 5.01%). YTD: DFC leads (25.53% vs 19.16%). 1 year: DFC leads (28.57% vs 27.22%). 3 years: AGC leads (126.60% vs 71.18%). Size (TRY): AGC leads (108.9M vs 106.5M). Investors: AGC leads (2,431 vs 1,458). Risk: AGC leads (2 vs 6).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date AGC returned 19.16% and DFC returned 25.53%; over the last year AGC returned 27.22% and DFC returned 28.57%. Over the last month AGC returned 1.71% and DFC returned −1.78%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, AGC has a size of TRY 108.9M with 2,431 investors, while DFC has a size of TRY 106.5M with 1,458 investors. AGC leads in size and AGC leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AGC is 2 out of 7 and that of DFC is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.