AGC vs BCK Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AGC (Ak Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) and BCK (Deniz Portföy Blockchain ve Fıntech Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | AGC | BCK | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.10% | 0.64% | 0.32% |
| 1 week | 0.44% | 2.40% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | 1.71% | 0.44% | −1.48% |
| 3 months | 6.27% | 5.48% | 4.48% |
| 6 months | 13.30% | 34.33% | 14.82% |
| YTD | 19.16% | 37.71% | 25.33% |
| 1 year | 27.22% | 42.20% | 35.72% |
| 3 years | 126.60% | — | 161.05% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the AGC vs BCK comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of AGC (Ak Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) and BCK (Deniz Portföy Blockchain ve Fıntech Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, AGC leads in 5 and BCK leads in 5. AGC is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; BCK is a Variable Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: BCK leads (0.64% vs 0.10%). 1 week: BCK leads (2.40% vs 0.44%). 1 month: AGC leads (1.71% vs 0.44%). 3 months: AGC leads (6.27% vs 5.48%). 6 months: BCK leads (34.33% vs 13.30%). YTD: BCK leads (37.71% vs 19.16%). 1 year: BCK leads (42.20% vs 27.22%). Size (TRY): AGC leads (108.9M vs 107.4M). Investors: AGC leads (2,431 vs 2,321). Risk: AGC leads (2 vs 6).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, AGC or BCK?
Year to date AGC returned 19.16% and BCK returned 37.71%; over the last year AGC returned 27.22% and BCK returned 42.20%. Over the last month AGC returned 1.71% and BCK returned 0.44%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, AGC or BCK?
As of September 28, 2026, AGC has a size of TRY 108.9M with 2,431 investors, while BCK has a size of TRY 107.4M with 2,321 investors. AGC leads in size and AGC leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of AGC and BCK mean?
The CMB risk score of AGC is 2 out of 7 and that of BCK is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.