Yatırımcı.AI

AFS vs FPH Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AFS (Ak Portföy Sağlık Sektörü Yabancı Hisse Senedi Fonu) and FPH (Fiba Portföy Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.

AFSFPH
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

AFS vs FPH Fund Comparison
MetricAFSFPHCategory median
Today (est.)—2.69%1.88%
Daily3.79%−3.31%−3.03%
1 week3.51%−3.32%−3.00%
1 month12.68%−11.45%−11.63%
3 months22.72%−9.25%−13.94%
6 months35.69%−11.94%−14.98%
YTD33.95%4.19%2.54%
1 year45.76%7.04%4.18%
3 years139.39%74.98%79.59%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Nov 2, 2026, 16:47.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the AFS vs FPH Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AFS (Ak Portföy Sağlık Sektörü Yabancı Hisse Senedi Fonu) and FPH (Fiba Portföy Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, AFS leads in 10 and FPH leads in 0. AFS is a Stock Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; FPH is a Stock Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: AFS leads (3.79% vs −3.31%). 1 week: AFS leads (3.51% vs −3.32%). 1 month: AFS leads (12.68% vs −11.45%). 3 months: AFS leads (22.72% vs −9.25%). 6 months: AFS leads (35.69% vs −11.94%). YTD: AFS leads (33.95% vs 4.19%). 1 year: AFS leads (45.76% vs 7.04%). 3 years: AFS leads (139.39% vs 74.98%). Size (TRY): AFS leads (1B vs 1B). Investors: AFS leads (28,796 vs 4,229).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date AFS returned 33.95% and FPH returned 4.19%; over the last year AFS returned 45.76% and FPH returned 7.04%. Over the last month AFS returned 12.68% and FPH returned −11.45%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, AFS has a size of TRY 1B with 28,796 investors, while FPH has a size of TRY 1B with 4,229 investors. AFS leads in size and AFS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AFS is — out of 7 and that of FPH is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.