AAV vs BFT Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AAV (Ata Portföy İkinci Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and BFT (Azimut Portföy Banka ve Finans Sektörü Hisse Senedi Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | AAV | BFT | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | −2.61% | −2.73% | −2.78% |
| Daily | −1.95% | −1.47% | −1.84% |
| 1 week | −3.40% | −0.46% | −4.21% |
| 1 month | −6.90% | −3.64% | −9.02% |
| 3 months | −4.08% | 2.84% | −10.58% |
| 6 months | −7.79% | −6.79% | −9.82% |
| YTD | 11.80% | 5.34% | 9.80% |
| 1 year | 17.32% | 19.41% | 18.36% |
| 3 years | 80.21% | — | 93.24% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the AAV vs BFT Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of AAV (Ata Portföy İkinci Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and BFT (Azimut Portföy Banka ve Finans Sektörü Hisse Senedi Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, AAV leads in 3 and BFT leads in 7. AAV is a Stock Fund fund managed by Ata Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; BFT is a Stock Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Today (est.): AAV leads (−2.61% vs −2.73%). Daily: BFT leads (−1.47% vs −1.95%). 1 week: BFT leads (−0.46% vs −3.40%). 1 month: BFT leads (−3.64% vs −6.90%). 3 months: BFT leads (2.84% vs −4.08%). 6 months: BFT leads (−6.79% vs −7.79%). YTD: AAV leads (11.80% vs 5.34%). 1 year: BFT leads (19.41% vs 17.32%). Size (TRY): BFT leads (238.8M vs 229.4M). Investors: AAV leads (1,746 vs 517).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, AAV or BFT?
Year to date AAV returned 11.80% and BFT returned 5.34%; over the last year AAV returned 17.32% and BFT returned 19.41%. Over the last month AAV returned −6.90% and BFT returned −3.64%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, AAV or BFT?
As of October 22, 2026, AAV has a size of TRY 229.4M with 1,746 investors, while BFT has a size of TRY 238.8M with 517 investors. BFT leads in size and AAV leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of AAV and BFT mean?
The CMB risk score of AAV is 6 out of 7 and that of BFT is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.