Yatırımcı.AI

AAL vs NRG Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AAL (Ata Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and NRG (Neo Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası Fonu) side by side.

AALNRG
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

AAL vs NRG Fund Comparison
MetricAALNRGCategory median
Daily0.11%0.10%0.10%
1 week0.71%0.77%0.71%
1 month3.21%3.27%3.17%
3 months8.29%10.12%10.01%
6 months17.77%21.46%21.27%
YTD28.75%33.10%32.49%
1 year42.48%47.25%46.26%
3 years247.50%266.41%255.20%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the AAL vs NRG Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AAL (Ata Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and NRG (Neo Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, AAL leads in 2 and NRG leads in 8. AAL is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Ata Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NRG is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: AAL leads (0.11% vs 0.10%). 1 week: NRG leads (0.77% vs 0.71%). 1 month: NRG leads (3.27% vs 3.21%). 3 months: NRG leads (10.12% vs 8.29%). 6 months: NRG leads (21.46% vs 17.77%). YTD: NRG leads (33.10% vs 28.75%). 1 year: NRG leads (47.25% vs 42.48%). 3 years: NRG leads (266.41% vs 247.50%). Size (TRY): NRG leads (2.3B vs 1.7B). Investors: AAL leads (4,243 vs 2,503).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date AAL returned 28.75% and NRG returned 33.10%; over the last year AAL returned 42.48% and NRG returned 47.25%. Over the last month AAL returned 3.21% and NRG returned 3.27%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, AAL has a size of TRY 1.7B with 4,243 investors, while NRG has a size of TRY 2.3B with 2,503 investors. NRG leads in size and AAL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AAL is 1 out of 7 and that of NRG is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.