ZRGYO vs TUPRS Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of ZRGYO and TUPRS side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | ZRGYO | TUPRS | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 19.00 | 398.75 | 6.78 |
| Daily change | −2.11% | −1.79% | −3.52% |
| Market cap | TRY 89.2B | TRY 768.3B | TRY 5.6B |
| P/E | 12.92 | 10.75 | 7.35 |
| P/B | 0.97 | 1.72 | 0.45 |
| Dividend yield | 0.51% | 4.00% | 1.34% |
| Return on equity | 8.54% | 18.20% | 0.92% |
| Free float | 5.43% | 49.42% | 28.00% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the ZRGYO vs TUPRS comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of ZRGYO (Ziraat GMYO) and TUPRS (Tüpraş) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 12:35. Of the 17 metrics compared, ZRGYO leads in 5 and TUPRS leads in 12.
Highlights: Daily change: TUPRS leads (−1.79% vs −2.11%). Market cap: TUPRS leads (TRY 768.3B vs TRY 89.2B). P/E: TUPRS leads (10.75 vs 12.92). P/B: ZRGYO leads (0.97 vs 1.72). EV/EBITDA: TUPRS leads (6.43 vs 38.97). EV/Sales: TUPRS leads (0.98 vs 47.03). Dividend yield: TUPRS leads (4.00% vs 0.51%). Gross margin: ZRGYO leads (71.69% vs 12.69%).
Frequently asked questions
Is ZRGYO or TUPRS cheaper?
By P/E, TUPRS is cheaper (12.92 vs 10.75); by P/B, ZRGYO trades at the lower multiple (0.97 vs 1.72).
Which is more profitable, ZRGYO or TUPRS?
Annual net margin is 171.04% for ZRGYO and 7.07% for TUPRS; return on equity is 8.54% for ZRGYO and 18.20% for TUPRS.
Which is more leveraged, ZRGYO or TUPRS?
The leverage ratio is 18.72 for ZRGYO and 46.13 for TUPRS; net debt/EBITDA is 3.89 for ZRGYO and −1.23 for TUPRS. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.