TUCLK vs CIMSA Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of TUCLK and CIMSA side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | TUCLK | CIMSA | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 4.20 | 42.52 | 26.66 |
| Daily change | −3.89% | −0.65% | −4.16% |
| Market cap | TRY 1.5B | TRY 40.2B | TRY 9.9B |
| P/E | — | 9.32 | 23.02 |
| P/B | 0.34 | 1.08 | 1.12 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.50% | 1.36% |
| Return on equity | −7.50% | 12.50% | −1.17% |
| Free float | 79.03% | 45.08% | 38.01% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the TUCLK vs CIMSA Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of TUCLK (Tugcelik) and CIMSA (Cimsa) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 15:49. Of the 15 metrics compared, TUCLK leads in 5 and CIMSA leads in 10.
Highlights: Daily change: CIMSA leads (−0.65% vs −3.89%). Market cap: CIMSA leads (TRY 40.2B vs TRY 1.5B). P/B: TUCLK leads (0.34 vs 1.08). EV/EBITDA: TUCLK leads (5.62 vs 8.12). EV/Sales: CIMSA leads (2.62 vs 4.81). Gross margin: CIMSA leads (17.56% vs 13.46%). EBITDA margin (annual): TUCLK leads (45.07% vs 18.96%). Net margin (annual): CIMSA leads (9.76% vs −16.49%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is TUCLK or CIMSA cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 9.32); by P/B, TUCLK trades at the lower multiple (0.34 vs 1.08).
Which is more profitable, TUCLK or CIMSA?
Annual net margin is −16.49% for TUCLK and 9.76% for CIMSA; return on equity is −7.50% for TUCLK and 12.50% for CIMSA.
Which is more leveraged, TUCLK or CIMSA?
The leverage ratio is 48.83 for TUCLK and 52.21 for CIMSA; net debt/EBITDA is 3.58 for TUCLK and 3.11 for CIMSA. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.