TRILC vs GUBRF Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of TRILC and GUBRF side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | TRILC | GUBRF | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 0.91 | 439.00 | 18.72 |
| Daily change | 1.11% | −4.15% | −4.73% |
| Market cap | TRY 943.7M | TRY 146.6B | TRY 4.4B |
| P/E | — | 19.22 | 18.20 |
| P/B | 0.47 | 3.89 | 1.14 |
| Return on equity | −4.59% | 23.87% | 1.78% |
| Free float | 73.16% | 20.28% | 37.21% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the TRILC vs GUBRF comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of TRILC (Türk İlaç Serum) and GUBRF (Gübre Fabrik.) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 10:00. Of the 15 metrics compared, TRILC leads in 5 and GUBRF leads in 10.
Highlights: Daily change: TRILC leads (1.11% vs −4.15%). Market cap: GUBRF leads (TRY 146.6B vs TRY 943.7M). P/B: TRILC leads (0.47 vs 3.89). EV/EBITDA: TRILC leads (3.67 vs 11.70). EV/Sales: TRILC leads (3.61 vs 3.90). Gross margin: GUBRF leads (26.69% vs 25.29%). EBITDA margin (annual): TRILC leads (27.80% vs 22.84%). Net margin (annual): GUBRF leads (13.44% vs −1.65%).
Frequently asked questions
Is TRILC or GUBRF cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 19.22); by P/B, TRILC trades at the lower multiple (0.47 vs 3.89).
Which is more profitable, TRILC or GUBRF?
Annual net margin is −1.65% for TRILC and 13.44% for GUBRF; return on equity is −4.59% for TRILC and 23.87% for GUBRF.
Which is more leveraged, TRILC or GUBRF?
The leverage ratio is 76.53 for TRILC and 41.50 for GUBRF; net debt/EBITDA is 2.88 for TRILC and −0.39 for GUBRF. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.