TERA vs KENT Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of TERA and KENT side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | TERA | KENT | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 78.30 | 272.75 | 10.44 |
| Daily change | −9.95% | 0.46% | −2.21% |
| Market cap | TRY 54.8B | TRY 90B | TRY 2.9B |
| P/E | 0.93 | — | 3.17 |
| P/B | 0.66 | 11.69 | 0.65 |
| Return on equity | 107.06% | −13.03% | 22.98% |
| Free float | 31.11% | 0.54% | 31.11% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the TERA vs KENT Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of TERA (Tera Yatirim Menkul Degerler) and KENT (Kent Gida) side by side as of Sep 29, 2026, 16:56. Of the 14 metrics compared, TERA leads in 8 and KENT leads in 6.
Highlights: Daily change: KENT leads (0.46% vs −9.95%). Market cap: KENT leads (TRY 90B vs TRY 54.8B). P/B: TERA leads (0.66 vs 11.69). EV/EBITDA: KENT leads (258.83 vs −1.53). EV/Sales: KENT leads (11.06 vs −0.76). Gross margin: TERA leads (22.43% vs 14.39%). EBITDA margin (annual): TERA leads (11.99% vs 5.65%). Net margin (annual): TERA leads (14.06% vs −6.14%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is TERA or KENT cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (0.93 vs —); by P/B, TERA trades at the lower multiple (0.66 vs 11.69).
Which is more profitable, TERA or KENT?
Annual net margin is 14.06% for TERA and −6.14% for KENT; return on equity is 107.06% for TERA and −13.03% for KENT.
Which is more leveraged, TERA or KENT?
The leverage ratio is 63.33 for TERA and 43.40 for KENT; net debt/EBITDA is −2.61 for TERA and 0.00 for KENT. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.