TERA vs ECILC Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of TERA and ECILC side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | TERA | ECILC | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 86.95 | 63.60 | 10.14 |
| Daily change | −9.99% | −7.15% | −4.32% |
| Market cap | TRY 60.9B | TRY 43.6B | TRY 2.9B |
| P/E | 1.03 | — | 3.18 |
| P/B | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.73 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.04% | 6.40% |
| Return on equity | 107.06% | −3.08% | 22.98% |
| Free float | 33.43% | 22.02% | 33.39% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the TERA vs ECILC comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of TERA (Tera Yatirim Menkul Degerler) and ECILC (Eczacıbaşı İlaç) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 12:58. Of the 14 metrics compared, TERA leads in 7 and ECILC leads in 7.
Highlights: Daily change: ECILC leads (−7.15% vs −9.99%). Market cap: TERA leads (TRY 60.9B vs TRY 43.6B). P/B: ECILC leads (0.68 vs 0.73). EV/EBITDA: ECILC leads (165.19 vs −1.41). EV/Sales: ECILC leads (9.35 vs −0.70). Gross margin: ECILC leads (37.83% vs 22.43%). EBITDA margin (annual): TERA leads (11.99% vs 11.49%). Net margin (annual): TERA leads (14.06% vs −20.86%).
Frequently asked questions
Is TERA or ECILC cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (1.03 vs —); by P/B, ECILC trades at the lower multiple (0.73 vs 0.68).
Which is more profitable, TERA or ECILC?
Annual net margin is 14.06% for TERA and −20.86% for ECILC; return on equity is 107.06% for TERA and −3.08% for ECILC.
Which is more leveraged, TERA or ECILC?
The leverage ratio is 63.33 for TERA and 18.92 for ECILC; net debt/EBITDA is −2.61 for TERA and 1.37 for ECILC. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.