TCKRC vs CIMSA Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of TCKRC and CIMSA side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | TCKRC | CIMSA | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 120.80 | 41.96 | 27.30 |
| Daily change | −8.00% | −1.96% | −4.69% |
| Market cap | TRY 20.5B | TRY 39.7B | TRY 9.7B |
| P/E | 11.06 | 9.32 | 23.04 |
| P/B | 3.09 | 1.08 | 1.13 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.50% | 1.36% |
| Return on equity | 34.79% | 12.50% | −1.17% |
| Free float | 32.03% | 45.08% | 38.01% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the TCKRC vs CIMSA Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of TCKRC (Kirac Galvaniz) and CIMSA (Cimsa) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 14:16. Of the 16 metrics compared, TCKRC leads in 10 and CIMSA leads in 6.
Highlights: Daily change: CIMSA leads (−1.96% vs −8.00%). Market cap: CIMSA leads (TRY 39.7B vs TRY 20.5B). P/E: CIMSA leads (9.32 vs 11.06). P/B: CIMSA leads (1.08 vs 3.09). EV/EBITDA: CIMSA leads (8.12 vs 10.91). EV/Sales: CIMSA leads (2.62 vs 6.60). Gross margin: TCKRC leads (39.40% vs 17.56%). EBITDA margin (annual): TCKRC leads (41.24% vs 18.96%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is TCKRC or CIMSA cheaper?
By P/E, CIMSA is cheaper (11.06 vs 9.32); by P/B, CIMSA trades at the lower multiple (3.09 vs 1.08).
Which is more profitable, TCKRC or CIMSA?
Annual net margin is 39.26% for TCKRC and 9.76% for CIMSA; return on equity is 34.79% for TCKRC and 12.50% for CIMSA.
Which is more leveraged, TCKRC or CIMSA?
The leverage ratio is 24.06 for TCKRC and 52.21 for CIMSA; net debt/EBITDA is 0.36 for TCKRC and 3.11 for CIMSA. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.