SNICA vs ARCLK Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of SNICA and ARCLK side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | SNICA | ARCLK | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 2.35 | 85.20 | 20.64 |
| Daily change | −3.29% | −0.70% | −4.12% |
| Market cap | TRY 1.4B | TRY 57.6B | TRY 3.8B |
| P/B | 0.28 | 0.75 | 1.17 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.71% | 1.50% |
| Return on equity | −13.50% | −4.06% | −4.60% |
| Free float | 53.56% | 17.46% | 34.94% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the SNICA vs ARCLK comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of SNICA (Sanica Isi Sanayi) and ARCLK (Arçelik) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 11:42. Of the 15 metrics compared, SNICA leads in 7 and ARCLK leads in 8.
Highlights: Daily change: ARCLK leads (−0.70% vs −3.29%). Market cap: ARCLK leads (TRY 57.6B vs TRY 1.4B). P/B: SNICA leads (0.28 vs 0.75). EV/EBITDA: SNICA leads (5.90 vs 9.31). EV/Sales: ARCLK leads (0.90 vs 1.87). Gross margin: ARCLK leads (29.57% vs 26.81%). EBITDA margin (annual): SNICA leads (18.11% vs 14.15%). Net margin (annual): ARCLK leads (−0.60% vs −22.65%).
Frequently asked questions
Is SNICA or ARCLK cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs —); by P/B, SNICA trades at the lower multiple (0.28 vs 0.75).
Which is more profitable, SNICA or ARCLK?
Annual net margin is −22.65% for SNICA and −0.60% for ARCLK; return on equity is −13.50% for SNICA and −4.06% for ARCLK.
Which is more leveraged, SNICA or ARCLK?
The leverage ratio is 40.53 for SNICA and 86.30 for ARCLK; net debt/EBITDA is 2.16 for SNICA and 2.78 for ARCLK. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.