SMART vs PCILT Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of SMART and PCILT side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | SMART | PCILT | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 15.83 | 30.32 | 25.54 |
| Daily change | −8.34% | −1.24% | −6.38% |
| Market cap | TRY 504.4M | TRY 3.6B | TRY 3.4B |
| P/E | — | 6.90 | 15.52 |
| P/B | 1.07 | 1.42 | 2.43 |
| Dividend yield | — | 8.49% | 1.95% |
| Return on equity | −9.10% | 25.01% | 4.43% |
| Free float | 93.23% | 34.99% | 38.56% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the SMART vs PCILT Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of SMART (Smartiks Yazilim) and PCILT (Pc İletişim Medya) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 14:16. Of the 14 metrics compared, SMART leads in 4 and PCILT leads in 10.
Highlights: Daily change: PCILT leads (−1.24% vs −8.34%). Market cap: PCILT leads (TRY 3.6B vs TRY 504.4M). P/B: SMART leads (1.07 vs 1.42). EV/EBITDA: PCILT leads (4.10 vs 9.52). EV/Sales: PCILT leads (0.42 vs 6.01). Gross margin: SMART leads (78.51% vs 8.12%). EBITDA margin (annual): SMART leads (51.21% vs 5.45%). Net margin (annual): PCILT leads (4.72% vs −32.00%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is SMART or PCILT cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 6.90); by P/B, SMART trades at the lower multiple (1.07 vs 1.42).
Which is more profitable, SMART or PCILT?
Annual net margin is −32.00% for SMART and 4.72% for PCILT; return on equity is −9.10% for SMART and 25.01% for PCILT.
Which is more leveraged, SMART or PCILT?
The leverage ratio is 47.56 for SMART and 53.71 for PCILT; net debt/EBITDA is 1.71 for SMART and −1.87 for PCILT. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.